“Which kiwi brands did you buy in the past seven days?”
How to measure and analyse the wonderful and complicated world of human behaviour, is a question which fascinates me. The complexity of capturing human behaviour in a valid way is what it makes interesting. As a researcher you do not want socially desired answers or answers that do not reflect the true situation of the respondent. You want to be able to draw conclusions from the data. In order to develop a valid research approach, engagement of respondents is key. A happy, fully engaged respondent, who can fill in his/her opinion/situation easily, provides us the valid answers we need.
Being active in market research, means that it is important to fill in questionnaires regularly. While filling in one of those questionnaires, a came across a discouraging example. This example is about kiwis. To be honest, I’m not a big fan of kiwis. So, when asked which products I bought recently, I did not select the kiwis. And then this question followed: Which kiwi brands did you buy in the past seven days?
I’m positive I did not buy any kiwis last week. However, I could not continue the survey without choosing a brand. This incorrect follow-up question really frustrated me, as I had to fill in an untrue answer. The consequence of this mistake in research set-up is that respondents get annoyed. They are forced to answer the question in a way that is not true. This decreases the validity of this particular question. Moreover, the engagement of respondents in total probably decreases as well. They don't bother selecting the correct answer anymore or even quit the survey. As a result, the research collects data that does not reflect the actual situation.
Such mistakes can easily be prevented, and they should be. My advice is to always check the question flow when choosing several answers. Every route of answers has to make sense before starting the fieldwork. In that way, valid research presents itself and makes me a happy researcher again.
LATEST POSTS
Visualising FAQ’s
It’s very important to keep panel members involved and motivated. After all, we need our panel members to provide our clients with valuable insights.
Research Improvements
Generation Swipe
If you look at the past 10 years, we can conclude that mobile phones have changed our lives. It not only influenced our personal lives, but it also changed business.
Research Improvements
Catching a movie
A seemingly obvious mistake, when you take that second glance, but not so obvious when writing your own questionnaire.
Research Improvements
Using social stories in questionnaires
Wouldn’t it be more useful for a respondent to see these commercials in environments where they are normally showed?
Research Improvements
Shopping for tea
I recently came across a technique that caught my attention since it really improved both my engagement and the reliability of my answers.
Research Improvements
The solution to screening-out respondents
Screening-out respondents can disappoint respondents, because they can’t give their opinion.
Research Improvements
Take your time
Recently, I received an invitation to fill out a survey, which surprised me quite a bit.
Research Improvements
Graphics, colours and interaction
Online questionnaires and surveys are still at the forefront of market research for many companies, as it opens up a vast number of possibilities.
Research Improvements
Memory
The limitations of a respondent’s memory are sometimes forgotten when programming a questionnaire.
Research Improvements
Creating interaction
To make questionnaires more engaging, it’s important to create a certain interaction for respondents.
Research Improvements